LEGEND: Blue - legitimate; Pink - illegitimate; Yellow - inbred
Say, a different common modern day scenario with the same characters but much worst: Mary conceived from her boyfriend John. But her child whom we will name as Pete, was denied by John, claiming Pete is the son of another man. Then John met Gloria and had relationship with her. When Gloria got pregnant with a child, we will call Anna. Again John denied Anna as his daughter. After Gloria, guess how many more women passed under John's naughty hands? Say this scenario continued also Pete meeting Anna (maybe this time in a disco house), fell in-love, and conceived an inbred child, Jerry with a congenital defect (let's say maybe this time a mongoloid or a retard).
Anna and Pete cannot be blamed for the case of Jerry. It's pretty obvious who is the culprit here. Yet, there are not just Johns out there. There are also Jane counterparts of John. So beware, and be watchful always.
We must understand that even in animal husbandry, inbreeding of livestocks are avoided because of fear for poor quality meat or other animal products, that's why pig farmers would rent another pig farmer's male stock to sire the former's female stock. In our case as humans, I firmly believe that inbreeding is prevented through marriages, and that marriage is not just some mumbo jumbo ritual, but was specifically designed to protect our species. Why? Simply because everything is documented, allowing us to trace whose lineage is who's. Is it not that priests, even judges, requires that you and your spouse-soon-to-be should not be at least third cousins? It is even debatable if fourth cousins are even safe to have congenital-defect-free offspring .
I hope the picture is quite clear now. Our culture has degenerated for the past four decades, due to irresponsible media broadcasts resulting to liberalisms, ignorant of possible consequences. Ever since the boom of the entertainment industry people were absorbed to the lifestyles of famous celebrities. So absorbed to the point of incorporating such lifestyles as their own, regardless of morality. But now, i personally is beginning to see the scientific reasons of morality, why it developed and practiced through the centuries in many different cultures but are strangely similar. Unfortunately nowadays, morality is being questioned, merely because it interferes with our quest for freedom of pleasures that we call fun or some would say "just fooling around". Now, if we keep on looking the other way, while almost everyday we encounter womanizers, adulterers, and sex masochist braggarts, chances are, children with untraceable roots are already inbreeding somewhere in our small world.
Maybe for some of you might argue of the unlikeliness of what I'm saying, but inbreeding is not just by sibling affinities, but as cousins of the first, second, and third degrees. And with our wayward culture that started three or four generations ago, how many do we think are out there right now, certain they are not marrying a half-sister, a half first cousin, and so on? Only to find out later there is something wrong with their children. But I'm not saying all with congenital defects have parents who are relatives, as we all know congenital defects can also be caused by excessive smoking of pregnant mothers, drug abuse, improper use of contraceptive meds, etcetera.
There's also one who argued with me, that hospitals and city registries hold everyone's birth certificates and could be a good reference for marriage, but are they reliable? Does that prevent the parents from giving inaccurate details for her illegitimate child? Such as a single mother would give her illegitimate child her own family name, just for the sake of the child having a family name on the birth certificate? Are we certain that the child will discover in time her father before she accidentally marries her half-brother?
I'm not saying we should hunt down and start eliminating illegitimates or induce violent discriminations because they are innocent victims of their parents. What can be done here is to repair the damage by tracing out the roots of the said children and properly document them, as references for marriage. Also authorities should impose marriages as strictly as possible to avoid inbreeding, and further deterioration of the human species.
If you're not convinced of the congenital defects when you marry your sister, first cousin, second cousin, or third cousin, here are some examples of the horrors of inbreeding:
- Ancient Egyptian Pharaonic Dynasties collapsed after several centuries because of this practice. Pharaohs would often marry their sisters and half sisters in order to keep the wealth and power in the family. Consequently, the offspring of the following generations were unfit physically and mentally to rule. One example is King Tut, recently discovered by geneticists to be a frail boy king, always needing a cane for support.
- King Charles II of Spain. The prevalent inbreeding in the Habsburg family genealogy, beginning in prior generations, had given many in the family hereditary weaknesses and left the later generations prone to still-births. In Charles II, it resulted in being disfigured, physically disabled, and mentally retarded.
- Baby Human Frog in Luxor. A woman in Luxor General Hospital in Egypt gave birth to this heavily deformed baby. The baby died after two hours. The doctors checked the medical history of the mother who did not take any medication during the pregnancy yet it turned out that she and her husband are relatives. In the middle eastern world, marriages with first cousins are allowed.

